|
SIA Sues USSA To Protect Snowboarders'
Olympic Rights!
Lee
Crane
(August 5, 1997)
Sound Off: What
do you think about the way US Skiing is treating snowboarders?
Related Articles:
18 Points
of Agreement
US Snowboard:
The Organization for Snowboarding's Future?
Just when US snowboarders were beginning to think it might be safe to pin
their Olympic hopes on the US Ski and Snowboard Association (formerly known
as US Skiing), it's back to business as usual at the Park City based
organization.
In a July 16 meeting in Chicago designed to work out the details of the US
Olympic Snowboard Team selection process, USSA CEO Bill Marolt explained
to the SIA Snowboard Committee that regardless of the
18 Point
Agreement made March 25, 1996, the US Olympic Snowboard team would be
chosen based on FIS points not the three US Grand Prix events.
Snow Industries of America was so distraught with USSA that they filed a
lawsuit against the organization in Virginia Federal Court. Although Snow
Industries President David Ingemie doesn't like the idea of a lawsuit he
believes it was necessary. "We've only done it to uphold the 18 Point Agreement
and it's unfortunate," Ingemie says. "They gave us reason to believe they
were not going to comply."
That's putting it rather nicely. According to Dennis Jenson, vice president
of Burton Snowboards, there was no doubt about Marolt's plans. "The crux
is that the CEO of US Skiing looks you in the eye and tells you that he's
going to do what ever he wants," Jenson said. "Marolt's approach to this
is based on his philosophical beliefs about developing athletes. And his
beliefs are potentially dangerous to the athletes and especially to the sport."
This cavalier attitude toward snowboarding is nothing new at USSA according
to Don Sather, chairman of International Snowboard Federation North America.
"They'll tell you what ever you want to hear, and do whatever they want to
do even in the face of a contract," Sather says. "This was really no surprise
to the USASA and ISF people."
What this means to American snowboarders is that if they want to be on the
US Olympic Snowboard Team they'll have to travel to Europe and compete on
the FIS World Cup Tour, a tour that many North American competitors feel
is inferior to the ISF World Cup Tour.
"It's all so confusing right now," says Lisa Kosglow, American Snowboard
Tour Alpine Champion. "I guess what this means is that since I have a good
shot at the Olympics I'm going to have to do five World Cups before the
Olympics."
Not only will this make it more difficult for snowboarders to get on the
team it is also discriminatory according to Sather. "We felt that the three
grand Prixes made the most sense," he explains. "It allowed the best athletes
to compete without discrimination against riders who cannot afford to travel
to Europe or were ineligible to compete in the FIS World Tour. What Marlot
is purposing could exclude some of the best riders in the US."
The lawsuit has the support of some of the biggest names in snowboarding
including Burton, Salomon/Bonfire, Morrow, Sims, Rossignol, and several other
companies. "There are some really important things that we're fighting for,"
says Brad Steward, president of Bonfire Snowboard Clothing. "We'll see what
happens it's going to be interesting."
A hearing is scheduled for August 15.
Editors note: USSA CEO Bill Marolt was unavailable for comment at press time.
Sound Off:
What
do you think about the way US Skiing is treating snowboarders?
|